Future Events
UK Anti-Corruption Forum
Workshop
“Corporate Anti-Corruption
Actions”
Friday 17th October 2008: 09.00 to
16.00
Venue: Institution of Mechanical
Engineers, 1 Birdcage Walk, Westminster, London, SW1
(020 7973 1253)
The UK Anti-Corruption Forum will hold a one day anti-corruption
Workshop in London on 17th October 2008 entitled
“Corporate Anti-Corruption Actions”.
The Workshop will be divided into four consecutive sessions:
1. Gifts, hospitality and facilitation payments;
2. Due diligence;
3. Internal monitoring and whistle blowing;
4. Crisis management.
Each session will commence with a panel discussion on the topic,
led by senior and experienced industry representatives. The topic
will then be thrown open for floor discussion. The purpose of the
Workshop will be to exchange ideas on how best to deal at corporate
level with some of the key challenges in this area. The Workshop
will be held under the Chatham House Rule to enable free exchange
of ideas and experiences. The following topics will be covered:
Gifts and hospitality
- When do gifts and hospitality become bribes?
- What limits should be put on gifts and hospitality?
- How should gifts and hospitability be controlled and
recorded?
Facilitation payments
- How can you avoid making facilitation payments, and still get
the required service?
- How to record and account for facilitation payments?
- Should facilitation payments be criminal offences?
————————
Due Diligence
- Why is due diligence necessary to prevent corruption?
- What due diligence should be undertaken before:
- Working in a new country
- Working with a new client
- Working with a new business partner (consortium or joint
venture partner, contractor, consultant, sub-contractor,
agent)
- Taking on a new employee
————————
Internal monitoring
- What monitoring systems should you put in place in your company
to prevent/uncover corruption?
Whistle-blowing
- What reporting systems should a company put in place?
- How does a company deal with reports?
————————
Crisis management
- What do you do if you discover corruption:
- Perpetrated by a member of your organisation
- Perpetrated against your organisation
- On a project you are involved in, but where the corruption does
not affect you?
————————
Download programme
and application form
Past Events
UK Anti-Corruption Forum
Conference
“Preventing Corruption in
Infrastructure”
London – 2nd October
2007
The Forum held an international anti-corruption conference in
London on 2nd October 2007, entitled “Preventing Corruption
in Infrastructure”. It was attended by over 120
participants from 10 countries.
The conference focused on practical aspects of corruption
prevention, and included senior speakers from the UK and Tanzanian
Governments, contractors, consultants, professional institutions,
the Beijing and London Olympics, the World Bank and EU Commission,
and UK prosecution authorities.
The conference was held under the Chatham House Rule, which
allowed all participants to speak freely. Therefore, transcripts
have not been published, and speakers cannot be attributed.
However, key points highlighted at the conference by some of the
speakers and/or during the discussion sessions were as follows:
- Successful anti-corruption action requires courage, leadership
and example from the top
- Corruption prevention in the infrastructure sector will only be
effective if all participants take action, including governments,
project owners, funders, contractors and consulting engineers.
- Companies working in the international infrastructure sector
are increasingly taking a firm stand against corruption. This often
results in companies withdrawing from corrupt markets or sectors,
leaving these markets and sectors potentially exposed to corrupt or
less able companies.
- The perception of many companies working in the infrastructure
sector is that governments and funders are not taking sufficiently
active steps to ensure that infrastructure funding is being
properly spent.
- Companies which have now introduced anti-corruption policies
may have problems in relation to projects awarded many years ago
when corruption prevention was not regarded as an issue in the same
way as it is now.
There was discussion on the possibility of an amnesty for past
acts, as long as a company could establish that it had now
committed to anti-corruption policies. It was suggested that only
if companies could be free of the risk of prosecution and debarment
for past activities could they openly and transparently deal with
the issues of corruption going forward.
- There were some successes in corruption prevention on major
infrastructure projects. Examples are the Beijing Olympic
Games and the Chung Jun Expressway in China, where in both cases
there was a significant anti-corruption focus throughout the
project cycle on fair competition, raising awareness, supervision
and reporting.
- Business associations and professional institutions can play a
major role by encouraging change, raising awareness and
implementing disciplinary procedures.
- The prevention of corruption should have equal standing with
health and safety in the requirements for professional status, and
in continuing professional development.
- The UK prosecution authorities have increased their resources
available to deal with allegations of overseas bribery, and that
many cases are currently under investigation.
View conference
programme
The publications are in PDF format. In order to read this format you will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have the Reader installed on your computer you can download it free from the Adobe website.